You did not really give me a solution. I was not implying FAS was not dojng its job. It is not FAS at all; FAS will happily process any number of records properly in a grid, combbox, etc. FAS is running it perfectly.
But that is not relevant to my issue, a common issue in business apps - large picklists. So if FAS is OK why not just use a grid or combobox, you say?
Let's take grid as an example. The problem is AW grid cannot have a data source of more than X items before slowing down, and eventually coming to almost a standstill. The number of data items varies with the memory, etc.
Alex himself on the AW forum says their grid cannot be used for large lists of data as it has no server side paging and probably never will. It does have a virtual mode, which helps a little on the client side. But robist grid productsm all have server side paging, which dishes out records a page at a time seamlessly. Look at the example here of how smooth a grid with 500,000 records can move with server side paging: http://mleibman.github.com/SlickGrid/examples/example-optimizing-dataview.html . You can look at their other examples as well, they have an async column fill, and more. Those are features that allow a grid to be used for anything. AW grid is an excellent GRID, but not good at DATA management.
There are no other options within VFP that will translate into a proper pickup list via FAS.
So FAS is working fine, but it is lacking this essential tool. Since I doubt you are switching grids soon, I was hoping you would have a solution.
I take it you do not have a solution.